SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(Cal) 216

P.B.MUKHARJI
KAZI MOHAMMAD HOSSAIN – Appellant
Versus
SIBRAM BONDOPADHYAYA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ADITYA NARAYAN RAY, B.B.DAS GUPTA, MANINDRA NATH GHOSH, MOHAMMAD TAHER ALI

P. B. MUKHARJI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a Second Appeal in a partition suit. The defendant, Kazi Mohammad Hossain is the appellant.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff commenced the suit for partition of lands mentioned in the Schedule to the plaint to the extent of plaintiff's 7 annas 12 gandas 2 krantis 14 tils share therein. The allegation of the plaintiff was that he was in joint possession of the undivided share in the suit lands and that the defendant appellant was in undivided possession of the remaining share. The plaintiff's case was that he acquirer tenancy settlement of (i) 1 anna 15 gandas 2 karas 14 tils from a co-sharer landlord, Pannasundari Devi on the 15th Bhadra, 1351 B. S. (ii) 1 anna 6 gandas 2 karas 2 krantis share from Biren Roy who acquired the interest of another co-sharer landlord, Rajendra Sanyal on the 3rd of Agrahayan. 1352 B. S. (iii) 2 annas 5 gandas share from another co-sharer landlord Shiba Sati Trust Estate on the 20th Chaitra. 1354 B. S. (iv) 2 annas 5 gandas share from another co-sharer landlord, namelv, the Estate of Ashutosh Mitra and others on the 15th Chaitra, 1351 B. S. After these aforesaid settlements the plaintiff alleged that he was in ejmali and joint posse



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top