SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(Cal) 233

BIJAYESH MUKHERJI
BABULALL CHOUKHANI – Appellant
Versus
CALTEX (INDIA) LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.K.Ghosh, D.K.De, D.P.MUKHERJI, P.K.MUKHERJI

BIJAYESH MUKHERJI, J.

( 1 ) BY this suit, the plaintiff Babulall Choukhani seeks to recover from the defendant Caltex (India) Ltd. , said to be a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, the sum of Rs. 25,000 as retention fee at the rate of Rs. 2,500 a month for ten months from August 1, 1963, to May 31, 1964.

( 2 ) A claim as this rested on a bilateral agreement in the form of a letter dated April 30, 1963, by Caltex to Babulall who by an endorsement at the bottom thereof over his signature dated May 1, 1963, confirmed the terms it embodied. The importance of this document to the fortunes of the present litigation is such that it deserves to be reproduced in full:mr. Babulal Chokhani, 24. A, Deshapriya Park Road, calcutta - 26. Dear Sir, lease of land owned by you at Prince Anwar Shah Road, Tollygunge, Calcutta. We refer to the discussions which took place this morning between our Messrs. E. M. Schmidt, R. Majumdar and K. C. Dutta and yourself regarding the abovementioned subject. We list below the points agreed upon and request that you sign the duplicate copy of this letter as a token of your confirmation and acceptance. It is understood that the conditions listed




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top