SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Cal) 85

U.C.LAW
NATIONAL AND GRINDLAYS BANK LTD. – Appellant
Versus
TIKAM CHAND DAGA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.C.Ganguly, H.HAZARIKA

U. C. LAW, J.

( 1 ) THE plaintiff has brought this action for recovery of sum of Rs. 1,80,414/- against the defendants as guarantors. The facts out of which this action arises shortly as follows:

( 2 ) A company known as the Central Jute Co. , Ltd. having its registered office at Narayanganj in East Pakistan (to be called hereafter as the Company) maintained an overdraft account with the plaintiff then carrying on business of banking in the name and style of National Bank of India Ltd. , Narayanganj Branch. Subsequently, the name of the plaintiff bank was first changed to National Overseas and Grindlays Bank Ltd, with effect from 1st January, 1958 and later on the name was again changed to National and Grindlays Bank Ltd. , with effect from 1st January, 1959.

( 3 ) BY the Deed of Hypothecation dated 8th November, 1954, the Company hypothecated in favour of the plaintiff the stocks of jute described in the Hypothecation Deed to secure a loan to granted by the plaintiff up to a limit of Rupees 10 lakhs (Pakistan Rupees ). On the same date i. e. , 8, November, 1954, the defendants Nos. 1, 2 and 3 executed in Calcutta a Deed of Guarantee in favour of the plaintiff in its Calcutta Bra

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top