SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Cal) 89

P.C.MALLICK
S. K. RUNGTA – Appellant
Versus
NAWAL KISHORE DEBI PROSAD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.B.TEBRIVAL, S.N.SHARAFF, Sankar Ghose

P. C. MALLICK, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application for stay under Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

( 2 ) THIS suit was instituted by the plaintiff firm for the recovery of the sum of Rs. 7669. 87 np. on a commis sion agency agreement. The defendants impleaded are the firm of Nawal Kishore Debi Prosad, with whom the plaintiff had the said commission agency agreement. Defendants No. 2 and 3, are the partners of the said firm of Nawal Kishore Debi Prosad. It is alleged in the plaint that the defendant firm has become liable to pay under the said agreement the sum claimed in the plaint, the accounts between the two firms, in terms of the agreement, were adjusted at the end of the Sambat years and the amount claimed has been found to be due on such adjustment. After giving credit for the amounts paid, for the recovery of the balance the instant suit has been instituted. Two of the defendants, namely, the defendant firm and defendant No. 2 have not entered appearance for have they filed their written statement. Defendant No. 3 has only entered appearance, but has not filed written statement. Instead, he has taken, out the present notice for stay on the ground that he had institut



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top