H.K.BOSE, G.K.MITTER
JITENDRA NATH ROY – Appellant
Versus
MAHESWARI BOSE – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is a purchaser's appeal from a decree refusing specific performance of an agreement for sare of immoveable property dated December 15, 1954. The learned trial Judge found that the plaintiff was not ready and willing to perform his part of the agreement at all relevant times and that the agreement for sale was duly cancelled by the defendant.
( 2 ) THE undisputed facts prior to the date of the suit filed on May 21, 1957 are as follows: The negotiation for the property i. e. premises Nos. 34a and 34b, Amherst Street were carried on between two solicitors namely Mr. Anil Kumar Ghose for the purchaser and Mr. Anil Kumar Dutta for the vendor commencing in the first week of December 1954, The vendor was one Maheswari Bose a Hindu widow, who wanted to sell the property for legal necessity. (After dealing with the correspondence between the solicitors the judgment proceeded to deal with the relevant terms of the draft agreement dated 13-12-1954 ). The terms of the agreement relevant for the purpose of this appeal are as follows:-- (1) The vendor agrees to sell as a Hindu widow the said two properties free from all incumbrances at Rs. 32,000/- out of which Rs. 501/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.