SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Cal) 193

P.B.MUKHARJI
COMMISSIONER OF WAKFS – Appellant
Versus
AYESA BIBI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARUNA MUKHERJEE, BHABESH CHANDRA MITTER, Jogesh Chandra Sinha, N.C.CHAKRAVARTI

P. B. MUKHARJI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure on behalf of the Commissioner of Wakf, West Bengal. It raises an interesting question.

( 2 ) A brief account of the facts will set out in good relief the points to be decided in this application. A title suit was filed in the third court of the Munsif, Howrah being title suit No. 21 of 1956 by Aysha Bibi who is the first opposite party in this application. That suit was instituted on or about the 14th day of February, 1956. The prayers in that suit were for a declaration that the Wakf deed executed by Haji Abdul Karim on the 30th March, 1917 was illegal, invalid, inoperative and void and not binding on the plaintiff. There was an incidental prayer for injunction. There were four defendants in that suit. The first three were (1) Mamud Ali who is the plaintiff's husband's brother's son, (2) Abdul Rashid who was the younger son of the plaintiffs husband's brother, (3) the third one is Daud Ali who is the plaintiff's son. (4) The fourth and the last defendant was the Commissioner of Wakf.

( 3 ) DURING the career of the suit and when it was about to be heard a compromise petition bearing




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top