SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Cal) 273

D.N.DAS GUPTA
RUPCHAND MAHATO – Appellant
Versus
CHARUBALA MAHATANI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
HARI NARAYAN MUKHERJEE, S.S.MUKHERJEE, SAMAR RAY CHAUDHARY

D. N. DAS GUPTA, J.

( 1 ) THIS revisional petition is directed against the order of a learned Magistrate granting a monthly maintenance allowance of Rs. 50 to the opposite party, Charubala Mahatani, under Section 488 Cr. P. C.

( 2 ) IT is not disputed that the parties are married and they lived together for some years. Thereafter the husband married a second wife and sometime thereafter a third wife. The opposite party then refused to live with the petitioner and went to live separately elsewhere. In the instant case she made allegations of torture against the petitioner which were not believed by the learned Magistrate. He seems to infer neglect from the fact of the petitioner marrying a third wife. The learned Magistrate observed:"this third marriage is an overt act which can be said to have changed the whole context materially. 1st party's surroundings in the O. P. s ghar is no longer the same before. Even if there Is no direct evidence of her torture and persecution at the hands of her husband, this act of her husband to remarry for the third time is enough disrespect to the sentiments of the 1st party and should be construed as gross neglect on the part of the O. P. 1st part


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top