SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Cal) 177

P.N.MUKHERJEE, D.BASU
SUDHIR KUMAR MONDAL – Appellant
Versus
ABHOY PADA SAHA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BRIJ MOHAN ROY, D.DAS, PANKOJ KUMAR GHOSE

P. N. MOOKERJEE, J.

( 1 ) IN this election appeal, two questions call for decision. The first relates to the construction of the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order 1950, Part XIII (2) Item 40, as amended in 1956, and the second of Section 101 (a) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. The controversy is acute as to whether the contesting respondent, who got himself declared elected to the reserved seat for the Scheduled Castes in the Khargram Legislative Assembly Constituency of West Bengal in the last General Election, held in February 1962, belonged to the Scheduled Caste, so as to be eligible for the said reserved seat. The controversy is also keen on the appellant's claim to be forthwith declared elected to the said reserved seat in case the respondent's election aforesaid is declared void.

( 2 ) TO resolve the above controversies, I proceed first to set out the relevant constitutional and statutory provisions, namely, the above amended Item 40 of Part XIII (2) (together with Paragraph 2, of which, plainly, it forms a part), of the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order 1950. and Article 341 (1) of the Constitution of India, under which the same was promulgated, and














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top