SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Cal) 79

U.C.LAW
SUMITRA DEBI JALAN – Appellant
Versus
SATYA NARAYAN PRAHLADKA – Respondent


U. C. LAW, J.

( 1 ) SM. Sumitra Debi Jalan (the plaintiff) is the daughter of a Radha Kissen Kanoria who is the Managing Director of Kanoria and Company, Ltd. Her case is that she purchased and took delivery of 5,100 ordinary shares of the Rohtas Industries, Ltd. , through her father. The share-scrips in respect of these shares together with the relevant blank transfer-deeds duly signed and endorsed by the registered holders were kept in the office of Kanoria and Company, Ltd. In her plaint she admits that she had not registered herself as the owner of these shares in the books of the Company, i. e. , Rohtas Industries, Ltd.

( 2 ) IT is stated that the defendant No. 1 was at the material time an employee of Messrs. North Bihar Sugar Mills, Ltd. , of which Kanoria and Company, Ltd. , was the managing agents. On or about the 3rd week of May, 1954, the said share-scrips together with some other shares were found to be missing from the office of Kanoria and Company, Ltd. , when the defendant No. 1 was on leave and it transpired as a result of enquiries made in that respect that the defendant No. 1 had stolen the said sharescrips from the office of Kanoria and Company, Ltd. , and had


































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top