SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(Cal) 22

HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
R. S. Bachawat, U. C. Law
MINARANI MAJUMDAR - Appellant
Versus
DASARATH MAJUMDAR - Respondent
Civil Revn. Case 4346  Of  1960
Decided On : FEBRUARY 11, 1963

Advocates Appeared:
ANANGA KUMAR DHAR, Binode Behari Halder

An application for maintenance under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, is not maintainable unless a decree has been passed under Sections 9 to 14 of the Act.

Headnote:

HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955 - SECTION 25 - MAINTENANCE - APPLICABILITY - DISMISSAL OF PETITION FOR DIVORCE - NO DECREE PASSED - APPLICATION FOR MAINTENANCE NOT MAINTAINABLE.

Fact of the Case:

The wife filed an application for maintenance under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, after her husband's petition for divorce under Section 13 was dismissed. The trial court dismissed the application on the ground that it was not maintainable since no decree had been passed.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the application for maintenance under Section 25 was not maintainable since no decree had been passed under Sections 9 to 14 of the Act, which are the only provisions under which substantive relief can be granted.

Issues: Whether an application for maintenance under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, is maintainable after the dismissal of a petition for divorce under Section 13.

Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted the expression "any decree" in Section 25 to mean any decree passed under Sections 9 to 14 of the Act, which grant substantive relief. Since the dismissal of the petition for divorce under Section 13 did not result in the passing of a decree, the court held that the application for maintenance was not maintainable.

Final Decision: The court discharged the rule and dismissed the application for maintenance.

BACHAWAT, J.

( 1 ) THIS rule was obtained by the wife against an order refusing to allow her maintenance under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The opposite party husband filed a petition under Section 13 of that Act praying for a decree of divorce. The petition was dismissed on l/-3-1960. Thereafter on May, 9, 1960, the petitioner wife launched an application praying for an order for her maintenance under Section 25. By an order dated August 12, 1950 me learned Judge dismissed the application on the ground that it was not maintainable. This rule is directed against the order dated August 12, 1950.

( 2 ) ON behalf of the opposite party husband it is urged that since the payment of maintenance under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 must be limited to the period "while the applicant remains unmarried", the applicant under the section must satisfy the condition mat she or he is "unmarried", and as the petitioner has not obtained a decree of divorce or nullity, she is not unmarried, being still the married wife of the opposite party, ana consequently her application under Section 25 is not maintainable. I am unable to accept this contention. An order for separate maintenance under Section 25 may be passed in favour of a married woman living apart from her husband, e. g. on the passing of a decree of judicial separation or of the passing of a decree for restitution of conjugal rights in the event of the decree not being complied with, me expression "any decree" in Section 25 is broad enough to cover any decree of divorce or nullity or of judicial separation or for restitution of conjugal rights. The heading and the body of the section refer to "maintenance", "permanent alimony" and "payment of periodical sums" which under the English practice are respectively the names of allowances granted after the passing of a decree of divorce or nullity, a decree of judicial separation and a decree for restitution of conjugal rights, see Matrimonial causes Act, 1950, Sections 19, 20 and 22 and Rayden on Divorce, 8th Edition, page 707. The scheme of Sections 24, 25 and 26 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 appears to be that the Court is vested with the power of passing orders tot maintenance of a spouse and for the custody, maintenance and education of minor children of the marriage during the pendency of any proceeding as also on the passing of any decree under Sections 9 to 14 of the Act. In a proper case the Court has, therefore, the power under Section 25 to pass an order for maintenance in favour of an applicant who is a married woman. The condition that tha maintenance is to be paid "while the applicant remains unmarried" is attached to every order for maintenance passed under Section 25. In the context of Section 25 (l) the condition means "while the applicant is not remarried. " This condition recalls to our mind the clause "dum sola et casta vixerit" which means "while she remains chaste and unmarried". Under the English practice, formerly, it was usual to attach those conditions to an order for maintenance of the wife after a decree of divorce or nullity, see Fisher v. Fisher, (1861) 2 Sw. and Tr. 410, but now the insertion of either condition has become the exception rather than the rule, Halsbury's Laws of England, Articles 983, 984 and Rayden on Divorce, 8th Edition, pages 74243. The rigid policy of Sec, 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, however, is that 3 party in whose favour an order for maintenance is passed cannot claim any maintenance under the order if subsequently the party has re-married or has become guilty of sexual immorality; the Court has no discretion in the matter, upon the party's re-marriage the maintenance ceases and the Court must rescind the order. The Court is also bound to rescind the order on the party becoming guilty of sexual immorality as mentioned in the section. The word "unmarried" has several meanings. An interesting discussion of its meaning will be found in the case of Soleman



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top