SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(Cal) 22

R.S.BACHAWAT, U.C.LAW
MINARANI MAJUMDAR – Appellant
Versus
DASARATH MAJUMDAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ANANGA KUMAR DHAR, Binode Behari Halder

BACHAWAT, J.

( 1 ) THIS rule was obtained by the wife against an order refusing to allow her maintenance under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The opposite party husband filed a petition under Section 13 of that Act praying for a decree of divorce. The petition was dismissed on l/-3-1960. Thereafter on May, 9, 1960, the petitioner wife launched an application praying for an order for her maintenance under Section 25. By an order dated August 12, 1950 me learned Judge dismissed the application on the ground that it was not maintainable. This rule is directed against the order dated August 12, 1950.

( 2 ) ON behalf of the opposite party husband it is urged that since the payment of maintenance under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 must be limited to the period "while the applicant remains unmarried", the applicant under the section must satisfy the condition mat she or he is "unmarried", and as the petitioner has not obtained a decree of divorce or nullity, she is not unmarried, being still the married wife of the opposite party, ana consequently her application under Section 25 is not maintainable. I am unable to accept this contention. An order for separate



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top