SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(Cal) 134

D.BASU
SYAMAPADA BANERJEE – Appellant
Versus
ASST. REGISTRAR, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, BURDWAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BALAI CHANDRA ROY, N.C.CHAKRAVARTI, SUDHIS CHANDRA ACHARYA, USHA MUKHERJI

D. BASU, J.

( 1 ) THE point for determination-in this application under Article 226 is solely one of statutory interpretation, namely, that of Section 86 of the Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, 1912 (1940? ).

( 2 ) THE petitioner is an ex-Secretary of the Guskara Union Co-operative Agricultural Credit Society (Respondent 3) which is a society governed by the above-mentioned Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Bengal Act' ). A 'dispute' under Section 86 of the Bengal Act, being Dispute Suit No. 2111-B of 1960-61 has been instituted. Before the Asst. Registrar (Respondent No. 1) by the Society (Respondent 3), claiming to recover money alleged to have been defalcated by the Petitioner while acting as the Secretary of the Society jointly with another person, ex-Manager of the Society, (vide Ann. C) and the Asst. Registrar has issued an order of attachment before judgment, dated 19-7-61, under Section 125 of the Bengal Act (Ann. A ). The petitioner has challenged the order of attachment as without jurisdiction and the proceedings as violating the principles of natural justice and asked for orders in the nature of mandamus and certiorari.

( 3 ) THE various points averred in the App

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top