SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(Cal) 180

P.C.MALLICK
BANKU B. DAS – Appellant
Versus
KASHI N. DAS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.P.Choudhury, B.N.DUTT, S.DEB

( 1 ) TTHIS Order is a proceeding in which Banku Behari Das seeks to propound the Will of his father Manmatha Nath Das. The Will is dated August 20, 1960. The Will is being contested by Kashinath and Hem Chandra. They have filed caveats and affidavits in support thereof. In the affidavits the only point of substance raised is that the instrument sought to be propounded is not a testamentary instrument and as such no probate can be granted to such an instrument. Mr. B. N. Dutta ray learned Counsel appearing for the caveators did not raise any other dispute. It is not disputed that the instrument was executed and attested according to law, as if it is a testamentary instrument.

( 2 ) THE provisions of the Will are simple. The instrument has been described as a testamentary instrument by Manmatha Nath Das and has been executed and attested by two attesting witness as such. The only son of the executant has been appointed executor. The disposition in the Will is in the following terms:"i am at present of the trustees to the debutter estate of Sm. Tripura Sundari Dasi deceased, for the deities Sri Sri Iswar Radha Ballav Jew at Brindaban, District Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, and I hereby ap








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top