BIJAYESH MUKHERJI
MOHAMMAD SAFIQUE – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is a plaintiff's appeal from an appellate judgment and decree of affirmance dismissing a claim against the Union of India awning and representing certain railways for compensation for non-delivery of a consign- ment.
( 2 ) THE sole appellant Mohammad Shafique and his brother Mohammad Rafique carry on business under the name and style of Mohammad Shafique and Brothers, a registered firm at Raniganj within the sub-division of Asansol. They deal in tobacco including what is called 'makha' (mixed) tobacco. With a view to manufacturing 'makha' tobacco of various qualities, they purchase scents from far and near.
( 3 ) ON September 27, 1951 the Foreign Scent Supplying Syndicate (shortened in the railway receipt into F. S. S. S.) of Bombay despatched one case of chemical perfumery christened 'satomala' from Borivli, a station the abbreviation of which in railway terminology is B. V. I. The case contained 112 Ibs. of 'satomala'. The destination of this consignment despatched under a parcel way bill No. B/15751-2 dated September 27, 1951 was Raniganj. It was consignment to self. The railway receipt which is the parcel way bill just stated was endorsed in
Dominion of India v. Gaya Pershad
Union of India v. Gangaji Kalyanji
Alliance Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Union of India
Alliance Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Union of India
Board in Mercantile Bank of India Ltd. v. Central Bank of India Ltd.
Sheo Prasad v. Dominion of India
Managing Agents (Martin and Co.) v. Deokinandan
Hari Mohan Dutt v. Dominion of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.