SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(Cal) 170

B.MUKERJI
PROTAP CHANDRA KOYAL – Appellant
Versus
KALICHARAN ACHARYA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Abinas Chandra Ghose, C.C.GANGULY, SIB KUMAR MAJUMDAR

B. MUKHERJI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal by the plaintiff Pratap Chandra Kayal whose suit against Kali Charan Acharya for damages caused by breach of a contract fails in both the Courts.

( 2 ) THE contract dated April 23, 1937 (exhibit 1) was that Pratap would pay to Kalicharan Rs. 316/- by Chaitra's end of 1348 B. S. (1942) whereupon Kali Charan would reconvey moiety shares admeasuring 6. 21 acres in certain plots of land. An 'ekrarnama' as that - such a familiar device - had to be resorted to, because Pratap had taken a loan of Rs. 300/- (as the averment in the plaint goes) from Kali Charan that very day, namely, on April 23, 1937 and executed a deed of sale (exhibit 2-a) in his favour for the same land reconveyance of which was secured by the 'ekrarnama'. Be that as it may, Pratap did tender the specified sum within the appointed time. But Kali Charan would not take it. That led to a suit for specific performance of the contract by Pratap against Kali Charan in 1945. It failed in the Court of first instance and the first Court of Appeal only to be decreed by this Court in second appeal on January 29, 1951. Exhibit A-1 is the certified copy of the Court's judgment. Pratap would









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top