SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(Cal) 121

HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
G. K. Mitter, C. N. Laik
ASSAM OIL CO. LTD - Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX (CENTRAL), CALCUTTA - Respondent
Wealth Tax Matter 153  Of  1960
Decided On : MAY 14, 1962

Advocates Appeared:
B.L.PAL, D.PAL, E.R.Meyer, S.MITRA

An assessee becomes indebted to the State for the payment of the amounts mentioned in an order under Section 18-A (1) of the Income-tax Act calling upon the assessee to pay tax in advance in certain instalments, although the same is subject to adjustment thereafter on the making of the regular assessment.

Headnote:

WEALTH TAX - Deduction - Debt owed by assessee - Provision for taxation - Instalment of demand under Section 18A (1) of the Indian Income Tax Act - Whether deductible.

Fact of the Case:

The assessee company was assessed to Wealth Tax for the assessment year 1957-58 as a non-resident company. In its return, it showed its net wealth as valued at Rs. 5,46,26,050/- as on December 31, 1956, taking into account a sum equivalent of 2,486,180 representing the amount owing for taxation as on December 31, 1956. The Wealth Tax Officer allowed the said deduction, but the Commissioner of Wealth Tax disallowed the same, increasing the net wealth by 2,486,180. The assessee appealed to the appellate tribunal, taking a supplementary ground that the last instalment of Rs. 47,86,2o7/- of the demand made under Section 18a (1) of the Indian Income Tax Act, which remained outstanding on the valuation date, should be allowed as a deduction in the computation of the net wealth.

Finding of the Court:

The Tribunal rejected the first contention holding that there was no debt owed by the assessee in the absence of quantification and ascertainment of the same due as tax. With regard to the second ground, it held that debts outstanding for not more than 12 months should be allowed as a deduction and the demand created under Section 18a was a debt owed by the assessee. It directed the Wealth Tax Officer to ascertain whether the demand referred to in this case was outstanding for less than one year and if so, he should allow the same as a deduction.

Issues: 1. Whether the sum of 2,486,180, which had been set apart by the assessee company as an estimated provision for meeting its tax liability in future less the last instalment of demand under Section 18a (i) of the Indian Income Tax Act, was a debt owed by the assessee on the relevant valuation date within the meaning of Clause (m) of Section 2 of the Wealth Tax Act? 2. Whether the final instalment of Rs. 47,86,207/- due under Section 18a of the Indian Income Tax Act constituted a debt owed by the assessee within the meaning of Clause (m) of Section 2 of the Wealth Tax Act as on the valuation date being 31st December 1956?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. An assessee is under a liability to pay income tax on the working of the whole year, but it does not owe a debt in respect of that liability on the date of valuation. The liability ripens into a debt only on quantification, which necessarily takes place after the passing of the Finance Act in any assessment year sometime in the month of April. 2. When an order under Section 18-A (1) of the Income-tax Act is made calling upon the assessee to pay tax in advance in certain instalments, he becomes indebted to the State for the payment of the amounts mentioned, although the same is subject to adjustment thereafter on the making of the regular assessment.

Final Decision: 1. The first question is answered in the negative and against the assessee. 2. The second question is answered in favour of the assessee.

G. K. MITTER, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a reference under Section 27 (1) of the Wealth Tax Act.

( 2 ) THE assessee company was assessed to Wealth Tax for the assessment year 1957-58 as a non-resident company. In its return it showed its net wealth as valued at Rs. 5,46,26,050/- as on December 31, 1956 being the valuation date taking into account a sum equivalent of 2,486,180 representing the amount owing for taxation as on December 31, 1956. The Wealth Tax Officer allowed the said deduction but the Commissioner of Wealth Tax, in exercise of power under Section 25 (2) of the Wealth Tax Act disallowed the same increasing the net wealth by 2,486,180. The assessee appealed to the appellate tribunal taking a supplementary ground, namely, that the last instalment of Rs. 47,86,2o7/- of the demand made under Section 18a (1) of the Indian Income Tax Act which remained outstanding on the valuation date should be allowed as a deduction in the computation of the net wealth. The assessee's contention was two-fold : (a) provision for taxation on the amount of the income as at December 31, 1956 was a debt owed by the company and therefore the entire amount should be deducted in arriving at the net wealth. (b) in any event the last instalment of the demand made under Section 18a (1) of the Indian Income Tax Act should be deducted from the total valuation in computing the net wealth.

( 3 ) THE Tribunal rejected the first contention holding that there was no debt owed by the assessee in the absence of quantification and ascertainment of the same due as tax. With regard to the second ground it held that debts outstanding for not more than 12 months should be allowed as a deduction and the demand created under Section 18a was a debt owed by the assessee. It directed the Wealth Tax Officer to ascertain whether the demand referred to in this case was outstanding for less than one year and if so he should allow the same as a deduction.

( 4 ) ON the above the following questions of law have been referred to this Court : (1) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the sum of 2,486,180 which had been set apart by the assessee company as an estimated provision for meeting its tax liability in future less the last instalment of demand under Section 18a (i) of the Indian Income Tax Act was a debt owed by the assessee on the relevant valuation date within the meaning of Clause (m) of Section 2 of the Wealth Tax Act?

(2) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, in computing the net wealth of the assessee the final instalment of Rs. 47,86,207/-due under Section 18a of the Indian Income Tax Act constituted a debt owed by the assessee within the meaning of Clause (m) of Section 2 of the Wealth Tax Act as on the valuation date being 31st December 1956?

( 5 ) SO far as the first question is concerned, the position has been discussed at length in the case of Kesoram Cotton Mills Ltd. v. Commr. of Wealth Tax, Calcutta, Matter No. 178 of 1960 (Cal), in which we have held that although an assessee is under a liability to pay income tax on the working of the whole year, it does not owe a debt in respect of that liability on the date of valuation the liability ripening into a debt only on quantification which necessarily has to take place after the passing of the Finance Act in any assessment year sometime in the month of April. The answer to the first question therefore apart from the consideration of payments directed under Section 18 (A) must be in the negative and against the assessee.

( 6 ) SO far as the second question is concerned, it seems to me that the assessee's contention must be accepted. Under Section 18 (1) of the Income-tax Act the Income-tax Officer may, on or after the first day of April in any financial year, by order in writing, require an assessee to pay quarterly to the credit of the Central Government on the 15th day of June, 15th day of September, 15th day of December and 15th day of March in that year, respecti



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top