SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(Cal) 121

G.K.MITTER, C.N.LAIK
ASSAM OIL CO. LTD – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX (CENTRAL), CALCUTTA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.L.PAL, D.PAL, E.R.Meyer, S.MITRA

G. K. MITTER, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a reference under Section 27 (1) of the Wealth Tax Act.

( 2 ) THE assessee company was assessed to Wealth Tax for the assessment year 1957-58 as a non-resident company. In its return it showed its net wealth as valued at Rs. 5,46,26,050/- as on December 31, 1956 being the valuation date taking into account a sum equivalent of 2,486,180 representing the amount owing for taxation as on December 31, 1956. The Wealth Tax Officer allowed the said deduction but the Commissioner of Wealth Tax, in exercise of power under Section 25 (2) of the Wealth Tax Act disallowed the same increasing the net wealth by 2,486,180. The assessee appealed to the appellate tribunal taking a supplementary ground, namely, that the last instalment of Rs. 47,86,2o7/- of the demand made under Section 18a (1) of the Indian Income Tax Act which remained outstanding on the valuation date should be allowed as a deduction in the computation of the net wealth. The assessee's contention was two-fold : (a) provision for taxation on the amount of the income as at December 31, 1956 was a debt owed by the company and therefore the entire amount should be deducted in arriving at the net wealt








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top