SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(Cal) 236

HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
R. S. Bachawat, R. N. Dutt
SULTAN KHAN - Appellant
Versus
SAILESH CHANDRA NUNDY - Respondent
Civil Revn. Case 1025  Of  1961
Decided On : NOVEMBER 27, 1962

Advocates Appeared:
MANAN KUMAR GHOSH, MRINAL KANTI GHOSH, P.B.Burman, RANJIT KUMAR GHOSAL

A non-citizen of India is not eligible for election as a member of the Gram Panchayat and Anchal Panchayat.

Headnote:

ELECTION - Gram Panchayat and Anchal Panchayat - Citizenship - Whether election can be set aside on the ground that the candidate is not a citizen of India - West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1956, Sections 7, 11, 15, 25, 26, 117 - Representation of the People Act, 1950, Sections 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 - Citizenship Act, 1955, Section 9.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a non-citizen of India, was elected as a member of the Gram Panchayat and Anchal Panchayat. The election tribunal set aside the elections on the ground that the petitioner was not a citizen of India. The petitioner challenged the order of the election tribunal.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the election tribunal was competent to set aside the elections on the ground that the petitioner was not a citizen of India. The court held that the petitioner's name was not rightly included in the electoral roll and that he was not eligible for election as a member of the Gram Panchayat and Anchal Panchayat.

Issues: 1. Whether the election tribunal had the jurisdiction to set aside the election on the ground that the candidate was not a citizen of India. 2. Whether the petitioner was eligible for election as a member of the Gram Panchayat and Anchal Panchayat.

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the election tribunal had the jurisdiction to set aside the election on the ground that the candidate was not a citizen of India. The court held that Section 9 (2) of the Citizenship Act, 1955 does not bar the jurisdiction of the election tribunal to determine this issue. 2. The court held that the petitioner was not eligible for election as a member of the Gram Panchayat and Anchal Panchayat. The court held that the petitioner's name was not rightly included in the electoral roll and that he was not a member of the Gram Sabha. The court held that the petitioner was not eligible for election as a member of the Gram Panchayat and Anchal Panchayat under Sections 11 and 26 of the West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1956.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the petition and upheld the order of the election tribunal.

BACHAWAT, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision case raises the question whether an election as a member of the Gram Panchayat or an election as a member of the Anchal Panchayat constituted under the West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1956 can be set aside by the election tribunal on the ground that the candidate is not a citizen of India. The election of the petitioner as a member of the Sarvamangala Gram Panchayat as also his election as a member of the Basaria Anchal Panchayat have been set aside by the election tribunal on this ground by its order dated the 15th March, 1961. The election took place on December 10 and 11, 1961. The name of the petitioner had then been entered without any objection from anybody in the finally published electoral roll of the West Bengal Legislative Assembly relating to the are of the Sarbamangala Gram Sabha. The petitioner was born in the territory of India; but in 1948 he migrated from the territory of India to the territory now included in Pakistan. He married and settled in Pakistan and lived there for more than ten years. In 1958 he came to India as a Pakistan national with a Pak-passport for temporary stay under a 'c' visa and since then he is living in india. As the petitioner migrated from India to Pakistan after the first day of March, 1947 and before the Constitution of India came into force, he must be deemed not to be a citizen of India having regard to Article 7 of the Constitution. The election tribunal rightly held that the petitioner never acquired the citizenship of India under the Constitution and that he never became a citizen of India.

( 2 ) THE contention of the petitioner that the jurisdiction of the election tribunal is taken away by Section 9 (2) of the Citizenship Act, 1955 is unsound and must be rejected. In Akbar Khan Alam Khan, v. Union of India, the Supreme Court held that Section 9 (2) of the Citizenship Act, 1955 does not bar the jurisdiction of a civil court to determine this issue. Likewise the power of the election tribunal to decide the issue is not taken away by the section.

( 3 ) ON behalf of the petitioner it is next contended that he is not disqualified from being elected as a member of the Gram Panchayat and of the Anchal Panchayat by reason of the fact that his election cannot be set aside by the election tribunal on that ground. This argument requires serious consideration. The purpose of the West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1956 is to organise and establish panchayats in rural areas of West Bengal. The Act has been passed in conformity with the directive principle of State policy contained in Article 40 of the Constitution which enjoins that the State shall take steps to organise village panchayats and endow them with such powers and authority as may be necessary to enable them to function as units of Self-government. The Gram Sabha is the primary unit of self government under the Act Chapter II of the Act deals with Grant Sabha. Section 3 empowers the State Government to constitute Gram Sabha for any area. Section 7 provides far its membership and reads thus:" (1) Every Gram Sabha shall consist of all persons whose names are included in the electoral roll of the West Bengal Legislative Assembly for the time being in force pertaining to the area for which the Gram Sabha has been constituted. (2) The prescribed authority shall from time to time maintain a list of the names of the persons referred to in Sub-section (1) and such list shall be the list of members of the Gram Sabha".

( 4 ) IT will be seen that the Gram Sabha is not an elected body. All persons whose names are included in the electoral roll of the West Bengal Legislative Assembly for the time being in force pertaining to the area of the Gram Sabha automatically became members of the Sabha. Chapter III of the Act establishes a Gram Panchayat for every Gram Sabha. The members of the Gram Panchayat are by Section 11 (2) elected by the members of a Gram Sabha from amongst themselves. Section 15 sets out the grounds of












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top