SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(Cal) 162

HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
S. K. Sen, N. K. Sen
SITARAM AGARWALA - Appellant
Versus
STATE - Respondent
Criminal Appeal 360  Of  1959
Decided On : AUGUST 11, 1961

Advocates Appeared:
A.C.MITTAL, A.K.DUTTA, BEJOY BHOSE, N.C.TALUKDAR, PRASUN CHANDRA GHOSH, SUDHANGSU S.MUKHERJI

Headnote:

SEA CUSTOMS ACT - SECTION 167 (81) - SMUGGLED GOODS - POSSESSION - INTENT TO DEFRAUD GOVERNMENT OR EVADE PROHIBITION - ACQUIRING POSSESSION OF SMUGGLED GOODS - INTERPRETATION - FACT OF THE CASE - Appellant Sitaram Agarwalla was found with a large sum of money and was seen meeting with appellant Wang Chih Kaw, who was in possession of 23 smuggled gold bars. Agarwalla was charged with being concerned in dealing with the smuggled gold under Section 167 (81) of the Sea Customs Act. Wang Chih Kaw was charged with possession of smuggled gold under the same section. FINDING OF THE COURT - The court found that Agarwalla had gone to meet Wang Chih Kaw with the intention of purchasing smuggled gold, but that the purchase was not completed due to the intervention of the police. The court held that Agarwalla's attempt to purchase smuggled gold did not constitute dealing with smuggled goods under Section 167 (81). The court also found that Wang Chih Kaw was in possession of the smuggled gold bars, but that the prosecution had failed to establish that he had any hand in smuggling the gold into India. ISSUES - Whether Agarwalla's attempt to purchase smuggled gold constituted dealing with smuggled goods under Section 167 (81) of the Sea Customs Act. Whether Wang Chih Kaw's possession of smuggled gold bars was sufficient to establish that he had committed an offence under Section 167 (81) of the Sea Customs Act. RATIO DECIDENDI - The court interpreted Section 167 (81) of the Sea Customs Act as requiring that the person charged must have knowingly and with intent to defraud the Government or evade a prohibition or restriction, acquired possession of or been concerned in dealing with smuggled goods. The court held that Agarwalla's attempt to purchase smuggled gold did not constitute dealing with smuggled goods because the purchase was not completed. The court also held that Wang Chih Kaw's possession of smuggled gold bars was not sufficient to establish that he had committed an offence under Section 167 (81) because the prosecution had failed to establish that he had any hand in smuggling the gold into India. FINAL DECISION - The court allowed both appeals and set aside the convictions of Agarwalla and Wang Chih Kaw under Section 167 (81) of the Sea Customs Act. MAIN LEGAL POINT - Mere possession of smuggled goods, without proof that the person charged had any hand in smuggling the goods into India in contravention of a restriction order, is not sufficient to bring the person within the ambit of Section 167 (81) of the Sea Customs Act. CATEGORY - Criminal Law SUB-CATEGORY - Customs Offences

S. K. SEN, J.

( 1 ) THE appellants of the two appeals Sitaram Agarwalla and Wang Chih Kaw have been convicted under Section 167 (81) of the Sea Customs Act. Sitaram Agarwala has been sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 2000/-, in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months, and Wang Chih Kaw has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for three months and to pay a fine of Rs. 1000/-, in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three months more.

( 2 ) THE prosecution case was briefly as follows: On 25-8-58, P. W. I Ram Sevak Ojha, a con-stable attached to the Detecting Department, noticed Sitaram Agarwalla and one Bholanath Gupta at the crossing Hariram Goenka Street and Kalakar Street. In consequence of an information received the constable decided to follow them. Sitaram Agarwalla and Bholanath Gupta got into a bus of route No, 32 and the constable also boarded the same bus. Sitaram Agarwalla and Bholanath Gupta got down from the bus at the junction of B. K. Pal Avenue and J. M. Avenue and so did the constable. These men took their seat in a park known as Narendra Deb Square. The constable kept watch on them from a distance. After a while these men came out and stood on the western footpath of J. M. Avenue. After sometime a baby taxi came there from the south along J. M. Avenue and stopped there. The accused Wang chih Kaw was in that baby taxi. He came down and shook, hands with the accused. Sitaram Agarwalla and all the three then got into the baiby taxi. When the taxi was about to start, the constable disclosed his identity to the driver and asked him to stop. He asked all of them to go to the thana, but the accused Sitaram Agarwalla and Bholanath Gupta got out of the taxi and tried to run away. The constable caught hold of them and put them inside a police wagon which happened to come up. The Chinese accused then tried, to escape. The constable asked the members of the public to secure him, and three young men of whom two were college students, namely, P. W. 2 Santi Kumar Sen and P. W. 3 Alok Kumar Dutta and P. W. 5 Tapaa Kumar Mnjumdar, chased the Chinese gentleman. who threw away three packets which these men picked up. A Sergeant, T. Mukherjee, came on a motor cycle from the opposite direction and he actually secured the Chinese accused Wang Chih Kaw, and the three young men handed over the three packets to the sergeant, T. Mukherjee. The sergeant took the Packets as well as the Chinese accused to Shampukur Police station and handect over the packets there as well as the accused. The packets were found to contain 23 gold bars of about 16 tolas each with Chinese inscriptions on them. On search of the person of Sitarane Agrarwalla who was also taken to Shampukur Police station, a sum of RS. 49,320/- in notes of various denominations was found with him.

( 3 ) SUBSEQUENTLY, the Customs Department took charge of the gold bars and by an order of the Customs Collector, the gold bars were confiscated. The police, after investigation, sent up the three accused Wang Chih Kaw, Sitaram Agarwalla and Binolanath Gupta in respect of an offence under Section 167 (81) of the Sea Customs Act. The learned Presidency Magistrate who tried the case held that the case was not sufficiently proved against Bhclanath Gupta and acquitted him. He, however, convicted, and sentenced Sitaram Agarwalla and Wang Chih Kaw as already stated. The two accused have filed two separate appeals which have been heard together.

( 4 ) MR. A. K. Dutt, appearing for the appellant Sitaram Agarwalla has challenged the story given by the constable Ram Sevak Ojha that he followed Sitaram Agarwalla and another person on a bus of route No. 32 upto Narendra Deb Square and that there he saw Sitaram Agarwalla shaking hands with a Chinese gentleman and climbing into a taxi along with the Chinese gentleman. He has pointed out that the three young men who chased the Chinese gentleman subsequently, namely, P. W. 2 Santi Kumar Sen, P. W. 3 Alok Kumar Dutta and P.















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top