SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(Cal) 221

HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
P. B. Mukharji, N. K. Sen
ARUN KUMAR BANERJEE - Appellant
Versus
STATE WEST BENGAL - Respondent
Criminal Appeal 381  Of  1961
Decided On : DECEMBER 18, 1961

Advocates Appeared:
AJIT KUMAR DUTT, Anil Kumar Sen, DILIP KUMAR DUTTA, S.N.BANERJEE

In a trial for murder, the fact of death can be proved by circumstantial evidence provided that the jury are warned that the evidence must lead to one conclusion only, and, that of the guilt of the accused.

Headnote:

CRIMINAL LAW - Murder - Conviction - Circumstantial evidence - Identification of dead body - Incriminating circumstances - Motive - Medical evidence.

Fact of the Case:

The two appellants were convicted of murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to death by the Additional Sessions Judge, Alipore, on the majority verdict of the jury of 7 to 2. There is also a Reference for confirmation of death sentence under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Finding of the Court:

The Court found that the prosecution had established beyond reasonable doubt that the two appellants murdered Sadhana.

Issues: 1. Whether the prosecution had established beyond reasonable doubt that the two appellants murdered Sadhana? 2. Whether the identification of the dead body was established beyond reasonable doubt? 3. Whether the incriminating circumstances against the appellants were sufficient to prove their guilt?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The Court held that the prosecution had established beyond reasonable doubt that the two appellants murdered Sadhana. The Court relied on the following incriminating circumstances: a. The sandal of appellant Arun was found near the dead body of Sadhana. b. Appellant Arun made a statement to a witness that people were saying that the photograph in the newspaper was that of Sadhana. c. Appellant Arun did not return to his residence after the murder and did not give any information to the persons in whose place he was residing. d. Appellant Arun made a false statement in the General Diary entry that Sadhana had gone away from his home on the 28th July, 1960, when in fact she had been killed on the 24th July, 1960. 2. The Court held that the identification of the dead body was established beyond reasonable doubt. The Court relied on the following evidence: a. The photograph of the dead body was published in the newspaper and members of Sadhana's family identified it as the photograph of Sadhana. b. The dead body was found at the burning ghat where Sadhana was last seen with the two appellants. 3. The Court held that the incriminating circumstances against the appellants were sufficient to prove their guilt. The Court found that there was no motive for the murder, but that the absence of motive did not vitiate the conviction.

Final Decision: The Court dismissed the appeal and disposed of the reference with the modification that the sentence was reduced to life imprisonment in case of both the appellants.

P. B. MUKHARJI, J.

( 1 ) THE two appellants were convicted of murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to death by the Additional Sessions Judge, Alipore, on the majority verdict of the jury of 7 to 2. There is also a Reference for confirmation of death sentence under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Both the appeal and the Reference have been heard together.

( 2 ) THE charge against the two appellants, Arun Kumar Banerjee and Narayan Chatterjee was in the following terms:"that you on or about the 24th day of July, 1960, at Dhikirhat Baharu P. S. Joynagar committed murder by causing the death of Sadhana Banerjee and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and within the cognizance of the Court of Session. And I hereby direct that you be tried by the said Court on the said charge".

( 3 ) SADHANA Banerjee was the wife of appellant Arun Kumar Banerjee. Appellant Narayan Chatteriee was the cousin (Awn's mother's sister's son) of appellant Arun. At the time of the death of Sadhana Banerjee she was about 19 years old, her husband, appellant Arun, was about 23 years old and appellant Narayan was also about 19 years old.

( 4 ) THE prosecution case may be stated briefly: Appellant Arun Kumar Banerjee married Sadhana Bose on the 13th May, 1960 after a period of courtship alliance which was supposed to begin from 1958. The marriage was art inter-caste marriage--appellant Arun was a Brahmin and Sadhana was a Kayastha. The marriage was not approved by the members of the family either of Sadhana or of Arun. No family members appear to have attended such marriage ceremony. The marriage took place at a place with the address 6-C, Rani Rashmani Garden Lane, a little north of Chingrighata Road. A gentleman by the name Bholanath Das (P. W. 7), an employee of the National Rubber Manufacturers Ltd. and an Assistant Secretary of the Labour Union actually did the sampradan ceremony of the marriage. Appellant Arun was employed as a worker in the factory of the Matronal Rubber Manufacturers Ltd. and used to be paid at a weekly rate of Rs. 15. 73 np. The marriage was attended by some of the employees of the Factory. After the marriage Arun and Sadhana are said to have taken up residence at Chingrighata at the address 8/158, Prabhuram Sarkar Lane.

( 5 ) AFTER about a month and a half of their stay at Chingrighata Arun and Sadhana came to Seal Colony at Dum Dum, to be more accurate at 105, Dum Dum Road. At this place Sadhana's father and some other members of Sadhana's family used to reside. Arun's father Prangopal Banerjee, ordinarily a resident of Rahara-Kharda brought Arun and Sadhana to 105, Dum Dum Road. The time when this took place was the 30th June, 1960. Since then Arun and Sadhana resided in a portion of the verandah adjoining the room where an elder sister of Sadhana called Shefali then unmarried used to live. That portion: of the verandah was fenced to to make room for Arun and Sadhana. This was at 105, Dum Dum Road.

( 6 ) WITHIN a period of about three weeks from the arrival of Arun and Sadhana at 105, Dum Dum Road, in fact on the 24th July, 1960, the appellant Narayan with Arun's younger brother Pota came to visit them and the three, the two appellants and Pota left together at about mid-day on the 24th July, 1960. In the after-noon at about 4. 30 p. m. Sadhana also left 105, Dum Dum Road. Her father Kalish Chandra Bose observed Sadhana on the Dum Dum Road and when he enquired he was told by Sadhana that she was going to Sealdah as instructed by her husband Arun. An hour thereafter at about 5. 30 p. m. on the same day Sadhana's friend, one Maya Kundu, also noticed Sadhana and the two appellants proceeding to wards, the South Station, Sealdah. After about a period of three hours at about 8-30 p. m. at night. Madhab Paramanik (P. W. 4), a resident of Baharu, P. S. Joynagar noticed the two appellants with Sadhana getting down at Baharu Rail way Station from t





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top