SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(Cal) 146

D.N.SINHA
ANUKUL CHANDRA MONDAL – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.P.CHATTERJEE

D. N. SINHA, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner in this case was appointed sometime in 1950, as an Upper Division Clerk in the Income Tax Department, West Bengal, by the Commissioner of Income Tax, West Bengal. Thereafter, his services were transferred to Calcutta and he was posted under the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Range II, who is under the Commissioner of Income Tax, Calcutta. On or about 20th March 1957 he was served with a charge-sheet containing two charges. The first charge was that while working as an assessment clerk attached to the 5th A. I. T. D. C. D. 11, he alone or in collusion with the notice-server of that office, with a view to helping the assessee, Narsi Purusottam and Co. , recorded the issue of notice under Section 34 (1) (a) relating to the assessment year 1945-46 on 27-3-54, both in his Issue Register and in the order sheet of the assessee's file, but retrained from effecting its service. With the same object, he also failed to report the non-service of the notice to his I. T. O. before 31-3-54, thereby allowing the assessee to escape assessment for the year 1945-46. The second charge was that when section 34 (1-A) of the Income-tax Act was intro







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top