B.N.BANERJEE
LEONARD BIERMANS WORKERS UNION – Appellant
Versus
SECOND INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL – Respondent
( 1 ) AN industrial dispute between Messrs. Leonard Biermann (hereinafter referred to as the company) and their workers was referred to the Second Industrial Tribunal, by an order dated August 5, 1959. The scope of the dispute was the demand by the workers for introduction of a scheme for payment of gratuity. The Tribunal came to the conclusion that the company was running at a loss for the last few years and was not in a position to hear the burden of gratuity. In that view of the matter the workers' claim for gratuity was rejected find the Tribunal passed an award accordingly. The award was published, under Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947, under a notification, dated July 23, 1960.
( 2 ) THE propriety of the award is being disputed in this Rule, at the instance of the Workers' Union.
( 3 ) A single point was argued for my consideration in this Rule. It was contended that the Balance Sheets of the company, on the basis of which, the Tribunal came to the conclusion about the financial incompetency of the company, were inadmissible in evidence, alternatively that they did not contain true statements about the economic position of the company and
Petlad Turkey Red Dye Works Co. Ltd. v. Dyes and Chemical Workers Union
Indian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd. v. Their Workmen
Bharatkhand Textile Manufacturing Co. Ltd., Ahmedabad v. Textile Labour Association
Express News Paper (Private) Ltd. v. Union of India
Harchura Tea Estate v. Labour Appellate Tribunal
Management of Trichinopoli Mills Ltd. v. National Cotton Textile Mill Workers Union
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.