SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(Cal) 41

P.N.MUKHERJEE
GOPENDRA NATH BASU MALIK – Appellant
Versus
PRATIVA RANI BASU MALLIK – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BISWANATH ROY, MANINDRA NATH GHOSH, Sourindra Nath Roy Chowdhury

P. N. MOOKERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THIS Rule arises out of a proceeding under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Before the District Judge, 24 Parganas, the present petitioner, who is the husband, applied for restitution! of conjugal rights as against the opposite party, who is, admittedly, his married wife. The application was made on August 6, 1959, under Section 9 of the above Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and, under the prevailing practice, it was registered as Title Suit No. 254 of 1959. Thereafter, the suit was transferred to the Fifth Court of the Additional District Judge at Alipore, where it was eventually registered as Title Suit No 82 of 1959 of that Court.

( 2 ) WHILE this suit was proceeding, the present opposite party, who was also the opposite party or the defendant or respondent in the above suit, applied, on September 5, 1959, for maintenance pendente lite and also for expenses of litigation, under Section 24 of the above Hindu Marriage Act. This application was opposed by the present petitioner, who contended, inter alia, that the said application was not maintainable in law at the instance of the aforesaid applicant and that, in any event, in the circumstances of t









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top