SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(Cal) 51

B.N.BANERJEE, NIYOGI
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
BENODE KUMAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ajoy Kumar Basu, Gupta, Sachindra Chandra Das Gupta

BANERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THE plaintiff, who is the respondent, claims to be a business man in stationery and toilet goods. He came to court with the case that, on June 9, 1951, he purchased a Railway Ticket from Bombay (Victoria Terminus) to Howrah and booked his luggages, consisting of nine cases of toilet goods. He paid the proper freight for the luggages and obtained luggage. Ticket No. 4919/9, dated June 9, 1951. According to the plaintiff the luggages were to be carried by 1 down train, leaving Bombay on June 9, 1951. Plaintiff alleged that the Railway Administration failed to deliver the luggages at Howrah Station and thus failed to perform its contractual obligation. The plaintiff claimed that he suffered a loss of Rs. 16,767-8-0 as detailed below:

.

Rs .

9 cases toilet goods etc. weighing   20 maunds 24 seers valued at 15,000-0-0 Freight etc. 267-8-0 Loss of Profit at 10% 1,500-0-0 Total claim 16,767-8-0

 

( 2 ) IN the aforesaid circumstances the plaintiff instituted the suit, out of which this appeal arises, claiming recovery of Rs. 16,767-8-0.

( 3 ) THE suit was contested by the Railway Administration. Paragraphs 7, 8 and 12 of the written statement, which are ma























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top