SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(Cal) 85

J.P.MITRA, D.N.DAS GUPTA
GOBINDA PRASAD PARUI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
KALI MOHAN CHAKRABORTY, MUKTI MAITRA

MITTER, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant was tried upon a charge under Section 467 of the Indian Penal Code by a learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Alipore, sitting with a Jury. The Jury returned a unanimous verdict of guilty which the learned Judge accepted. The appellant was convicted and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 4 1/2 years.

( 2 ) THE prosecution case was that the appellant, a pleader's clerk, committed forgery by altering the digit * "8" to * "3" of the figure * "1368" as also by erasing the word * (sic) in a copy of a registered bainapatra kept in volume 85 at Alipore Sub-registry Office. The charge however way forging * a certain document purporting to be a valuable security, to wit, a registered bainapatra, executed by Nabiruddin Mistry in favour of Bepin Behary Das, deed No. 7675 of the year 1955 recorded in volume No. 85 at page 288 etc.

( 3 ) THE appellant pleaded not guilty to the charge and his case was that he had been coerced to make a confessional statement to the Sub-Regis trar, Alipore.

( 4 ) IT is not disputed that nowhere in his summing up did the learned Judge refer to the document as a copy of the registered bainapatra. As already observed, the ch

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top