J.P.MITRA, D.N.DAS GUPTA
GOBINDA PRASAD PARUI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
( 1 ) THE appellant was tried upon a charge under Section 467 of the Indian Penal Code by a learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Alipore, sitting with a Jury. The Jury returned a unanimous verdict of guilty which the learned Judge accepted. The appellant was convicted and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 4 1/2 years.
( 2 ) THE prosecution case was that the appellant, a pleader's clerk, committed forgery by altering the digit * "8" to * "3" of the figure * "1368" as also by erasing the word * (sic) in a copy of a registered bainapatra kept in volume 85 at Alipore Sub-registry Office. The charge however way forging * a certain document purporting to be a valuable security, to wit, a registered bainapatra, executed by Nabiruddin Mistry in favour of Bepin Behary Das, deed No. 7675 of the year 1955 recorded in volume No. 85 at page 288 etc.
( 3 ) THE appellant pleaded not guilty to the charge and his case was that he had been coerced to make a confessional statement to the Sub-Regis trar, Alipore.
( 4 ) IT is not disputed that nowhere in his summing up did the learned Judge refer to the document as a copy of the registered bainapatra. As already observed, the ch
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.