SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(Cal) 81

A.N.RAY
RAMCHAND JAGDISHCHAND – Appellant
Versus
THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
E.R.Meyer, G.P.KAR, M.K.BANERJI, SOMNATH CHATTERJI

A. N. RAY, J.

( 1 ) MESSRS. Ramchand Jagdishchand obtained this Rule calling upon the respondents to show cause why a Writ of Certiorari should not be issued for quashing the order dated April 20, 1960 and further for a Writ of Mandamus requiring the respondents to forbear from giving effect to the order and also for a Rule as to why a Writ of Mandamus should not be issued directing the respondents to refund the sum of Rs. 20,818. 25 as mentioned in the petition.

( 2 ) THE petitioner on or about May 22, 1959, placed an order for supply of 8 cases of woollen fabrics with Messrs. K. Jos Otten of Germany through Messrs. T. S. Narang of Bombay at the rate of 20 shilling per yard. The goods arrived at the Port of Calcutta and were thereafter landed at the said port on or about August 28, 1959. On arrival of the goods the petitioner through its Clearing Agent, on September 5, 1959, submitted to the Assistant Collector of Customs, Appraisement, respondent No. 2 above named, the necessary documents, namely, Bill of Lading, Invoice and the Bill of Entry, wherein the real value, quantity and description of the goods were stated along with a declaration that the statements contained in the



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top