SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(Cal) 40

P.N.MUKHERJEE, NIYOGI
NARENDRA NATH CHATTERJEE – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONERS OF BALLY MUNICIPALITY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Anil Kumar Sen, Chittatosh Mookerjee, MAJUMDAR, SHAMBHUNATH BANERJI

P. N. MOOKERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THIS Rule was taken out by the petitioner in connection with the ensuing Municipal election of the Bally Municipality, or to be more specific, of Ward No. III of that Municipality.

( 2 ) THE election is being held under the Bengal Municipal Act, hereinafter referred to also, in some places, as, simply, the Act. The petitioner who has been registered as Voter No. 1012 of the said Bally Municipality, Ward No. III, in the finally published Electoral Roll, filed his nomination paper duly with the Chairman of the Municipality as required by law (Vide Rule 17 (1) of the Election Rules, made under Section 44 of the Bengal Municipal Act, hereinafter referred to as the Election Rules ). The date of the general election of the Municipality was fixed by an appropriate notification under Rule 2 (Vide Sub-rules (1) and (2)) of the above Election Rules and it is due to be held on February 14, 1960. On December 28, 1959, the last date for the filing of nomination papers was fixed (vide Rule 17 (1)) as January 7, 1960. The petitioner's nomination paper was duly filed within the said fixed date. On January 14, 1960, which was the date of scrutiny (Vide Rule 17 (3)), the
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top