SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(Cal) 175

P.B.MUKHARJI, H.K.BOSE
PANCHANAN PAL – Appellant
Versus
NIRODE KUMAR BISWAS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.C.Dutt, Manjula Bose, NIREN DEV, R.L.SINHA, S.N.GHORAI

P. B. MUKHARJI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal by the plaintiff from the judgment and decree of the learned trial Judge dismissing the plaintiff's suit.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff instituted a suit on the 10th September, 1952 against Nirode Kumar Biswas claiming only two reliefs, (1) a declaration that premises No. 1/a, Jadu Nath Sen Lane was a charge for the payment of Rs. 8,333-5-4 and (2) for a mortgage decree for the same amount under Order 34, Rule 4 in Form 5a in Schedule 1 of Appendix D of the Code of Civil Procedure. No other relief was sought. It was a plain and simple suit to enforce a charge on immovable property and for a mortgage decree thereupon.

( 3 ) THE plaint was amended twice by the plaintiff. On the 7th January, 1953, there was an order of amendment whereby another transferee pendente lite was brought in as a second defendant--Sm. Bimala Bala Sashmal--and it was pleaded in paragraph 6a of the plaint that by a registered conveyance dated the 23rd September, 1952, one Surendra Nath Biswas claiming to be the real purchaser conveyed and the first defendant Nirode Kumar Biswas stated in that conveyance to be a benamdar of Surendra Nath Biswas confirmed the sale of the said,




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top