R.S.BACHAWAT, S.C.LAHIRI
PANNALAL PAUL – Appellant
Versus
PADMABATI PAUL – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is an appeal from an order refusing to set aside an award. The appellants and the respondents carried on business in co-partnership in Homoeopathic medicines under the name and style of Paul and Co. , at No. 82, Clive Street, and another business in paper under the name and style of Hari Narayan Paul and Co. , at No. 103. Old China Bazar street. The appellants Pannalal Paul, Chunilal Paul and Lakshman Chandra Paul are the sons of one Hari Narayan Paul, deceased, and each of them had one-fourth share in the profits and losses of the two partnership businesses. The respondent Padmabati is the widow and the respondents Satya Charan Paul and Amar Nath Paul are the minor sons of another son of Hari Narayan Paul and they jointly had one-fourth share in the profits and losses of the two businesses. The respondents instituted a suit in this Court for dissolution and accounts of the two partnerships and for the realisation and distribution of the partnership assets and properties. The respondents also applied for appointment of a receiver. By an order dated January 31, 1956 all disputes in respect of the two partnerships mentioned in the plaint and in the petition f
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.