SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(Cal) 66

NIYOGI, S.K.SEN
ABINASH CHANDRA MONDAL – Appellant
Versus
MATILAL MUKHERJEE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
RANJIT K.BANERJEE, SAMARENDRA NATH MUKHERJI, SAMBHUNATH BANERJEE

NIYOGI, J.

( 1 ) THIS second appeal is by the plaintiff in Title Suit No. 34/1949 of the First Court of the Munsif at Howrah, against the judgment and decree passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Second Additional Court, Howrah, dismissing the appeal preferred by him against the judgment and decree of the said learned Munsif, dismissing the above suit. The facts of this case lie within a narrow compass and may be stated as follows:

( 2 ) RESPONDENTS Nos. 12 and 13 used to hold a Jama of Rs. 20/7/- and odd under the co-sharer landlords, Respondents Nos. 1 to 11. The plaintiff-appellant auction-purchased the said holding in the sale held on 18-11-46 in Rent Execution case No. 73/1946, started by some of the co-sharer landlords, namely, Respondent No. 1 and Late Bejoy Krishna Mookerjee, predecessor of Respondents Nos. 2 to 4, in execution of the decree obtained by them on 11-6-43 in Rent Suit No. 142/1942. The said sale was confirmed on 19-12-46. But it appears that another co-sharer landlord, namely, Anath Nath Goswami, Respondent No. 5, had previously instituted a Rent Suit (No. 453/1940) and in execution of the decree obtained therein on 20-1-41, himself auction-purchased the h










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top