SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(Cal) 107

G.K.MITTER
LAWANG TAHANG – Appellant
Versus
GOENKA COMMERCIAL BANK LTD. – Respondent


G. K. MITTER, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition to wind up a company which was registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1913, in the year 1945 under the name and style of Goenka Commercial Bank Ltd. The grounds of the application are that the substratum of the company is gone and in the events which have taken place and the situation in which the company is placed it is just and equitable to wind up the company. A further ground) is taken that the company had suspended business for more than a year before the presentation of the petition. Strictly speaking, the first ground is treated in text books as one of the various branches of the 'just and equitable' clause but there have been instances in which Courts have resorted to the 'just and equitable' ground apart from that of failure of the substratum of the company.

( 2 ) THE Memorandum of Association of the company shows that its name was the Goenka Commerical Bank Ltd. Clause 3 of the Memorandum enumerates the various objects of the company. The clause is divided under 29 heads. Sub-clauses (1), (2) and (3) of Clause 3 are as follows: (1) establishing and carrying on the business of a bank, whereof the head office or place of busin























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top