SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(Cal) 206

J.P.MITRA, NIYOGI
KEDAR NATH SAHARIA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARUN KUMAR MUKHERJI, J.M.BANERJEE, N.C.BANERJI

MITTER, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner is the Managing Director of Messrs. Satya Narain Tea Co. , (Private) Limited. In connection with his business, he had a quota Certificate for 100 tons of iron and steel. It is alleged that out of the said quota, he sold 36 tons of galvanized corrugated sheets in the black market. Consequent upon a report about the said sale by the Officer-in-charge of Hare Street Police Station, the learned Chief Presidency Magistrate purported to take cognizance of the case under Sections 7 and 10 of the Essential Commodities Act 1955 (Act X of 1955 ).

( 2 ) THIS Rule involves the question whether in view of the provisions of Section 11 of the Essential Commodities Act 1955, the learned Chief Presidency Magistrate could on the basis of the said police report, take cognizance of the offences concerned.

( 3 ) SECTION 11 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, is as follows:-"no court shall take cognizance of any offence punishable under this Act exception a report in writing of the facts constituting such offence made by a person who is a public servant as defined in Section 21 of the Indian Penal Code (XLV of 1860 ). '

( 4 ) MR. Banerjee appearing for the petition




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top