SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(Cal) 256

H.K.BOSE, P.B.MUKHARJI
AJIT CHANDRA MAJUMDAR – Appellant
Versus
AKHIL CHANDRA MAJUMDAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BIDYUT GHOSH, GOURI MITRA

P. B. MUKHABJI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal from the judgment and order of P. C. Mallick J. , dismissing the propounder's petition for probate of a holograph will of the testator who outlived the will by about sixteen years, on the ground that the conscience of the Court had not been satisfied.

( 2 ) THE propounder Ajit Chandra Majumdar is the youngest son of the testator Adhar Chandra Majumdar. The testator had four sons, Akhil, Anil (the caveator), Ajit and one Arun who predeceased the testator. The predeceased son left a widow and four children, none of whom is contesting the will. The eldest son Akhil did not fife any affidavit In support of the caveat. The second son Anil, who is a doctor, is the caveator and he filed an affidavit in support of his caveat. Anil alone gave evidence at the trial of this contentious cause. Akhil neither filed any affidavit nor gave any evidence in Court and Anil's evidence in support of his caveat was ordered to be taken as the Written Statement of both Akhil and Anil against Ajit's petition for probate, regarded as the plaint in this contentious cause. The position, therefore, is that of all the four sons of the testator, one is the propounder,








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top