SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(Cal) 257

P.N.MUKHERJEE, NIYOGI
RADHARANI MITRA – Appellant
Versus
KANAKLATA ROY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Anil Kumar Sen, HEMENDRA CHANDRA SEN, MANINDRA NATH GHOSH, SATYENDRA CHANDRA SEN

P. N. MOOKERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is by the defendants and it arises out of a suit for declaration of title and recovery of possession. The suit property comprises four rooms in a house, known as Lalkuthi. The nature of the controversy between the parties in the suit and in this appeal will appear from the following statements of their respective cases:

( 2 ) ACCORDING to the plaintiffs, Lalkuthi belonged to their predecessor Ishan Chandra Mitra. Ishan died, leaving three sons, Bipin Behari, Lal Bihari and Charu Chandra. Charuchandra died, leaving a widow and a son Baidyanath and a daughter Umarani. Umarani was married to Anath Nath Roy, and they had two sons, Ashutosh and Ajit. Anath, in his turn, was a son of Jitendra Nath Roy and his elder brother was Nalini Nath Roy. The original plaintiffs in the present suit were Kanak Lata Roy, wife of Nalini Nath Roy, Umarani Roy, wife of Anath Nath Roy, and the two sons of Umarani, namely, Ashutosh and Ajit, as mentioned hereinbefore. According to the plaintiffs, in this property of Ishan, namely, Lalkuthi, - along with his (Ishan's) other properties, - Charuchandra inherited a one-third share, which devolved, upon his death, upon his









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top