SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(Cal) 95

K.C.DAS GUPTA, H.K.BOSE
E. GRIFFITHS HUGHES LTD. – Appellant
Versus
VICK CHEMICAL CO. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.GANGULY, B.N.DUTT ROY, P.P.Ginwalla, S.CHOWDHURY

BOSE, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is from the decision of the Deputy Registrar of Trade Marks, Calcutta, and raises primarily the question of construction of Section 6 of the Trade Marks Act, 1940.

( 2 ) ON 22nd October, 1945 the appellant, a British Company carrying on the business of Manufacturing Chemists, applied before the Registrar of Trade Marks, Calcutta, for registration of a trade mark consisting of the words "karsote Vapour Rub" represented in special type and the words "protective comforting. Germ Killing" in smaller type, inside a black rectangular border, for a chemical product specified as a vaporising ointment. This Mark was advertised as accepted in the Trade Marks Journal of January 1949.

( 3 ) ON 2nd May, 1947 the respondent, an American Company, also applied before the Registrar of Trade Marks, Calcutta, for registration of a trade mark consisting of the word "vapo Rub" for goods specified as "pharmaceutical preparations". This mark was however advertised as accepted a month earlier in the Trade Marks Journal of December, 1948.

( 4 ) AS a result of these advertisements the appellant and the respondent filed their oppositions against each other's application for reg












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top