SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(Cal) 94

P.C.MALLICK
KAMAL BROTHERS – Appellant
Versus
HANSRAJ KAPUR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.P.MUKHERJI, I.P.MUKHERJI, SAMBIDANANDA DAS

P. C. MALLICK, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application for an order restraining the respondent Sreechand Agarwalla his servants or agents from proceeding with Suit No. 398 of 1958 filed in the City Civil Court. The application is made by Hansraj Kapur and is instituted In the Matter of the Arbitration Act and In the Matter of Arbitration Agreement dated April 19, 1951 (Sreechand Agarwalla v. Hansraj Kapur ). The arbitration clause is to be found in a partnership agreement dated April 19, 1951 a copy of which is annexed to the affidavit of Jitesh Chandra Sanyal. The parties to the agreement are the parties to this proceeding,

( 2 ) CLAUSE 2 o the Partnership Deed indicates that Kamal Bros, the new partnership will be carried on at No. 13, Manohardas Street in which the respondent Agarwalla was already carrying on his own business.

( 3 ) CLAUSE 12 provides that the goodwill of the firm will always belong to Kapur the petitioner.

( 4 ) CLAUSE 14 is the arbitration clause and reads as follows :"any dispute regarding the partnership business will be decided by Arbitrator appointed by each of the partners, In case of difference of opinion between the Arbitrators the decision of the Umpire app











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top