SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(Cal) 105

P.B.MUKHARJI
D. P. DUNDERDELE – Appellant
Versus
G. P. MUKHERJEE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.K.ACHARYA, SACHINDA CHAUDHARY

P. B. MUKHARJI, J.

( 1 ) THE point for determination on this application is whether the firm of Calcutta Solicitors called 'sandersons and Morgans' can be said to be an industry so as to be liable to haw their disputes with their employees determined by the principles and procedure laid down by the Industrial Disputes Act.

( 2 ) THE application is made by the partners of the registered firm of Solicitors Messrs. Sandersons and Morgans. They all practice in this High Court as Solicitors and attorneys. The application is made under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. It asks for a Writ of Certiorari and prohibition to quash the order of reference to the Industrial Tribunal dated 5-9-1956 and the interim award made by the Industrial Tribunal on 6-5-1957 and to restrain the respondents from giving effect to that award. The Tribunal by its interim award held that the firm of Solicitors Messrs. Sandersons and Morgans carry on a work which is industry within the meaning of Section 2 (j) of the Industrial Disputes Act. The respondents include the Industrial Tribunal as well as the Sandersons and Morgans Employees Union.

( 3 ) A preliminary point on jurisdiction under Article 226 m


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top