SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(Cal) 220

P.B.CHAKRAVARTTI, S.C.LAHIRI
BEPIN BEHARY MULLICK – Appellant
Versus
LAKSHASONA DASSI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
I.P.Das, P.N.CHAUDHURY, Rabi Lal Mitra, S.DAS

P. CHAKRAVARTTI, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application for the substitution of the heirs and legal representatives of a deceased party, made within time and prima facie it was a simple application. In the course of the argument, however, Mr. T. P. Das has raised a point which, in my view, deserves to be dealt with in a judgment instead of being disposed of by a mere order.

( 2 ) THE facts are these : In a partition suit brought with respect to the estate of one Nanda Lal Mullick, a preliminary decree was passed on 1-4-1938. Under that decree, the share of one Madan Mohan Mallik was declared to be 1/7th and another 1/7th was declared to be the share of one Anukul Chanclra Mallik. Anukul, it appears, transferred his share in one of the joint properties to a Marwari lady who has thus come to bo interested in his share along with his heirs and legal representatives, but with that matter we are not here concerned. After the preliminary decree had been made, there was the usual reference to a Commissioner of Partition who made his return in due course. Exceptions to his return were taken by the heirs and legal representatives of Anukul who had, in the meantime, died. The exceptions were r




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top