SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(Cal) 275

P.B.MUKHARJI
U. N. MANDALs ESTATE PRIVATE LTD. – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


P. B. MUKHARJI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application by two persons Nagendra Nath Mandal and Biswanath Mandal. The application is made under two specific sections which are described as Sections 433 and 560 of the Companies Act, 1956. Section 433 deals with the circumstances in which the company could be wound up by the Court. Section 560 deals with the power of the Registrar to strike a defunct company off the register and the Court's power either to restore the company or to wind up the company thereafter.

( 2 ) THE applicant Biswanath Mandal has no locus standi. He is neither a registered shareholder nor a member nor a director of the company Rai Saheb U. N. Mandal's Estate Private Ltd. An application for winding up can be made by persons and authorities mentioned in Section 439 of the Companies Act. The applicant Biswanath Mandal does not come within that classification. An application under Section 560 for restoration under Section 560 (6) of the Act can only be made by the company, member or creditor. But the applicant Biswanath Mandal is neither the company nor the member nor the creditor. It follows, therefore, that so far the application is an application by Biswanath Mandal








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top