HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Renupada Mukherjee, B. N. Banerjee
EARNEST BENTO SOUZA - Appellant
Versus
JOHN FRANCIS SOUZA - Respondent
A. F. O. D. 129 Of 1956
Decided On : FEBRUARY 3, 1958
WILL - Execution and Attestation - Antedated Will - Admissibility of Evidence - Sound Disposing Mind - Collusion and Undue Influence - Probate.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant, the propounder of a will executed by a Goanese Indian Christian woman, Mrs. D'souza, challenged the lower court's refusal to grant probate. The objections to the will included allegations of improper execution and attestation, lack of sound disposing mind, and collusion and undue influence.
Finding of the Court:
1. Execution and Attestation: The court held that the will was duly executed and attested, relying on the testimony of a lawyer witness and the Sub-registrar who registered the will. The evidence of an officer from the Stamp and Stationary Department regarding the availability of the paper used in the will was deemed inadmissible due to privilege and inconclusive. 2. Sound Disposing Mind: The court found that the testatrix had a sound disposing mind at the date of the will, despite her old age and ailments. The medical evidence presented by the objectors was deemed unreliable, and the court relied on the testimony of the lawyer witness and the Sub-registrar to establish the testatrix's mental capacity. 3. Collusion and Undue Influence: The court found no evidence of collusion or undue influence in the creation of the will. The alleged community of interest among the lawyer, the beneficiary, and the identifier was not established, and the suggestion of undue influence was deemed unfounded.
Issues: 1. Whether the will was duly executed and attested. 2. Whether the testatrix had a sound disposing mind at the date of the will. 3. Whether the will was brought into existence as a result of collusion or undue influence.
Ratio Decidendi: 1. Execution and Attestation: The court relied on the clear and cogent testimony of the lawyer witness and the Sub-registrar to establish due execution and attestation of the will. The evidence of the Stamp and Stationary Department officer was deemed inadmissible due to privilege and inconclusive. 2. Sound Disposing Mind: The court held that the testatrix had a sound disposing mind at the date of the will, despite her old age and ailments. The medical evidence presented by the objectors was deemed unreliable, and the court relied on the testimony of the lawyer witness and the Sub-registrar to establish the testatrix's mental capacity. 3. Collusion and Undue Influence: The court found no evidence of collusion or undue influence in the creation of the will. The alleged community of interest among the lawyer, the beneficiary, and the identifier was not established, and the suggestion of undue influence was deemed unfounded.
Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, the judgment and decree of the lower court were set aside, and probate of the will was directed to be granted to the appellant.
( 1 ) THE appellant of this appeal is the propounder of the last will and testament said to have been executed by a Goanese Indian Christian woman who instead of being described by her long name may simply, be described as Mrs. D'souza. She was the widow of one Cactano Paul Souza and was domiciled at Asansol where she had been living since 1906 and where she died on the 2nd March, 1953. The will in question bears the date of 8th March, 1952, and it was registered at the subregistry office at Asansol on the llth December 1952. The testatrix left two sons, John Francies Souza and the propounder Earnest Bento Souza, and she also left two daughters, Mrs. Mary Angelica Goves and Mrs. Rosamunda D'silva. The two daughters and the elder son John Francies Souza filed objections to the application for probate of the will, their contention being that the will was not genuine and it was not legally executed and attested and that the testatrix had no sound disposing mind at the date of the will, having been subject to various physical and mental infirmities. It was further contended that the disputed will was secured by the propounder from the testatrix in collusion with pleader Kshitish Bhusan Sarkar and J. Rule Femandez who were attesting witnesses to the will taking advantage of her loss of intellect and power of discrimination and without lett-ing her know the contents of the will.
( 2 ) UPON these objections the following issues were raised in the Court below:"1. Is the alleged will legally executed and attested? "2. Did the testatrix understand the contents of the will and was she of sound disposing mind? "3. Is the will an expression of the desire of the testatrix or was it brought into existence as a result of collusion or undue influence"?
( 3 ) THE propounder adduced evidence in support of his case that the testatrix executed the will with full knowledge of its contents and while in possession of full testamentary powers-and the will was attested according to law. The objectors adduced counter evidence in support of their contentions already mentioned. Upon a consideration of the evidence and the circumstances of the case the Court below held, in. the first place, that the will was antedated and was not attested according to law; secondly, the Court below held that the testatrix did not understand the contents of the will and had no sound disposing mind at the date of the will, and lastly, the Court below held that the will was brought into existence as a result of collusion and undue influence. In view of these findings the Court below refused to grant probate and so the propounder has preferred this appeal. The correctness of all these three findings has been challenged in this appeal on behalf of the appellant, and we shall presently consider whether there is any substance in this challenge.
( 4 ) FIRST of all, we take up the question ot execution and attestation of the will. This document was marked exhibit 1 in the Trial Court. It consists of three typed sheets of demi or cartridge paper each p3ge purportin; to bear the signature of the testatrix. Another such signature also appears towards the bottom-of the last page. The signatures are mere scribblings. There is, however, evidence to show that the testatrix did not know much of English and. she was a fairly old woman being nearly 70 years of age. The ostensible date of execution, of the will is 8th March, 1952, End the date ot registration is 11-12-1952, The properties bequeathed by the will consist of a residential house at Asansol, described in schedule A of the will, and some monies lying in the account of the testatrix in the Imperial Bank and the Post Office. These amounts are not mentioned: in the will, but from the application for probate it would appear that the deposit in the Imperial Bank amounted to Rs. 1379/6as and the other deposit amounted to Rs. 2513/11 as. Some gold, which presumably consisted of gold ornaments of the testatrix, wa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.