SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(Cal) 59

RENUPADA MUKHERJEE, BANERJEE
NIYATI BHUSAN TA – Appellant
Versus
BEJOY CHANDRA GHOSH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Chandidas Roy Chowdhury, Girija Bhusan Hazra, TARUN KUMAR BANERJEE

RENUPADA MUKHERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal arises out of an insolvency petition filed by the respondents of this appeal against appellant Niyati Bhusan Ta in the Court of the learned District Judge of Hooghly.

( 2 ) THE main allegation of the petitioning creditors was that the appellant had borrowed a sum of Rs. 2,000/- from each of them and executed a promissory note in favour of each agreeing to pay interest at the rate of 10 p. c. p. a. These handnotes are said to have been executed on 30th Chaitra, 1358 B. S. corresponding to 12-4-1952. The allegation of the petitioning creditors was that the appellant had become seriously involved in debts and he had many other creditors and he was not in a position to pay off either the petitioning creditors or those other creditors. The allegation of the petitioning creditors further was that in order to defeat and delay his creditors the debtor had executed two sale-deeds, one on 17-6-1952 and another on 18-6-1952 in the names of two of his friends. The application was filed on 15-9-1952.

( 3 ) BEFORE dealing with the objection filed by the appellant debtor we may mention that another creditor, viz. , Kasi Nath Singha Boy made an applicati










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top