SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(Cal) 55

P.B.CHAKRAVARTTI, S.N.GUHA RAY
NATIONAL TEXTILES – Appellant
Versus
PREMRAJ GANPATRAJ – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.C.BHABRA, A.C.MITRA, E.R.Meyer

P. CHAKRAVARTTI, C. J.

( 1 ) A short point has been urged in support off this appeal though at considerable length. Them has been some citation of authorities, but the point has ultimately to be decided on principle.

( 2 ) THE facts are as follows. On the 18th of December, 1950, the respondent, Premraj Ganpatraj, brought a suit against the appellant. National Textiles, for recovery of a sum of Rs. 2,36,946-10-2. The suit has been described as an agent's suit against a principal for reimbursement, but, in reality, it appears to have been a claim for commission on account of commission agency dealings. On the 8th of May, 1956, a decree was passed in the suit and, by that decree, Mr. A. N. Sen, a member of the Bar, was appointed a Special Referees on a settled remuneration of 100 gold mohurs, to be paid by the plaintiff in the first instance, to determine what amount was due by the defendant to the plaintiff in respect of the commission agency dealings which had taken place between 1st of January, 1949 and the 18th of December, 1950. Pending the receipt of the Referee's report, further hearing of the suit was adjourned. As regards the time within which the Referee was to make his re
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top