SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(Cal) 167

K.C.DAS GUPTA, DEBABRATA MOOKHERJEE
SOBHANA SEN – Appellant
Versus
AMAR KANTA SEN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Bimal Chandra Chatterjee, G.GUPTA, NIRMAL CHANDRA MUKHERJI, Sachindra Chandra Das Gupta

K. C. DAS GUPTA, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is against an order made by the District Judge, 24-Parganas on an application by tile wife for maintenance pendente lite and expenses of proceedings, under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The husband started the proceedings under the Hindu Marriage Act and prayed for a decree of divorce. In the application under Section 24 of the Act, the wife, who is the appellant before us made a prayer for a sum of Rs. 3000 "or such other Bum as the Court may think reasonable and sufficient'' for the expenses of this suit and Rs. 650/-per month for her maintenance during the pendency of the proceedings. The learned District Judge has made an order directing the husband to pay maintenance pendente lite at the rate of Rs. 200/-per month with effect from the 1-5-1956. As regards the prayer for expenses of the proceedings, e passed the following order :"i tentatively assess the probable cost of the respondent in this divorce proceeding at Rs. 500/ -. The petitioner is directed to pay the respondent in this divorce proceeding at Rs. 500/ -. The petitioner is directed to pay the respondent Rs. 200/- towards the aforesaid costs. This cost must be paid















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top