SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(Cal) 249

RENUPADA MUKHERJEE
IDANNESSA BIBI – Appellant
Versus
SYED ABDUL WADUD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMBICA CHANDRA BHATTACHARYA, Charu Chandra Ganguly, NARENDRA NATH BANERJI

RENUPADA MUKHERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal arises out of a suit between the plaintiff landlady who is appellant of this appeal and her tenant who is respondent in this appeal. There was no dispute in the Courts below as to the existence of the relationship of landlord and tenant between the parties, nor was there any dispute as to the amount of rent of the disputed premises. The landlady instituted the suit in the Trial Court for eviction of the tenant on the ground that he was a defaulter, and he had disentitled himself from getting any protection against eviction by non-payment of rent for the period required by law. Service of a notice to quit purporting to determine the tenancy was also alleged to have been served upon the tenant.

( 2 ) THE suit was contested by the defendant whose defence was that no valid notice to quit had been served upon him, and that he had not committed such default as had deprived him of protection against eviction.

( 3 ) DURING the pendency of the suit an application under Section 14 (4) of the West Bengal Premises Rent Control (Temporary Provisions) Act of 1950 was filed on behalf of the landlady for a direction upon the tenant to pay arrears of rent











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top