SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(Cal) 158

SINHA
HUKUMCHAND JUTE MILLS LTD. – Appellant
Versus
LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Bhabani Shankar Chaudhury, H.N.SANYAL, J. MAJUMDARMDAR, N.C.CHAKRAVARTI, NIHARENDU D.MAJUMDAR, SUSHIL KUMAR DUTT

SINHA, J.

( 1 ) THE two applications relate to a decision of the Labour Appellate Tribunal dated 4th February, 1956. This was in appeal against an award of an Industrial Tribunal, dated 31st August, 1954, published in the Calcutta Gazette on 23rd September, 1954.

( 2 ) THE facts are briefly as follows:

( 3 ) ONE Balaram Singh was employed by the Hukumchand Jute Mills Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the 'company') as a Time Keeper in the Shifter Section Spinning Department, of Mill No. 1. On 3rd January, 1953 he was served with a charge sheet comprising of ten different charges. After hearing him, the General Manager of the Company found him guilty of all the charges and he was dismissed by an order dated 31st January, 1953. Thereupon, Singh appealed against the said order to the Managing Agents and after hearing him the order of the General Manager was upheld on 27th February, 1953. On 24th September, 1953 the dispute between Singh and the Company was referred to the adjudication of the respondent No. 2, the Second Industrial Tribunal. The only dispute referred was as follows: "is Balaram Singh entitled to reinstatement". The Tribunal thereupon entered upon the adjudication. The







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top