HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
P. B. Mukharji
P. H. AVARI - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL - Respondent
Matter 39 Of 1957
Decided On : DECEMBER 11, 1957
BENGAL EXCISE ACT - FOREIGN LIQUOR LICENSE FEE RULES - VALIDITY - FEE ON SALE TO SIKKIM - WHETHER ULTRA VIRES - SIKKIM AS A PROTECTORATE - WHETHER A FOREIGN SOVEREIGN STATE - MEANING OF 'EXPORT', 'IMPORT' AND 'TRANSPORT' UNDER THE ACT - WHETHER LEGISLATION REGARDING INTER-STATE TRADE AND COMMERCE - WHETHER ULTRA VIRES THE POWERS OF THE STATE LEGISLATURE UNDER THE CONSTITUTION.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a holder of a license for the sale of foreign liquor, challenged the order of the Collector of Excise, Calcutta, directing him to pay gallonage fees on the sale of foreign liquor to Ramdas Ramphalram of Gangtok (Sikkim), who allegedly held a license in the State of Sikkim. The petitioner contended that the sale took place in Sikkim, which he assumed to be a foreign sovereign State, and that the imposition of gallonage fee was ultra vires and illegal.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that Sikkim was not a foreign sovereign State but a protectorate of India, and that the sale to Ramdas of Gangtok (Sikkim) was not made under a valid excise pass issued to a person who holds or is deemed under Section 20 of the Bengal Excise Act, 1909, to hold a license thereunder for the sale of foreign liquor. The court further held that the levy of gallonage fee was not legislation regarding inter-State trade and commerce and was, therefore, not ultra vires the powers of the State Legislature under the Constitution.
Issues: 1. Whether the sale of foreign liquor to Ramdas Ramphalram of Gangtok (Sikkim) was made in Sikkim, which was assumed to be a foreign sovereign State, and whether the imposition of gallonage fee was ultra vires and illegal. 2. Whether Sikkim was a foreign sovereign State or a protectorate of India. 3. Whether the sale to Ramdas of Gangtok (Sikkim) was made under a valid excise pass issued to a person who holds or is deemed under Section 20 of the Bengal Excise Act, 1909, to hold a license thereunder for the sale of foreign liquor. 4. Whether the levy of gallonage fee was legislation regarding inter-State trade and commerce and whether it was ultra vires the powers of the State Legislature under the Constitution.
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that Sikkim was not a foreign sovereign State but a protectorate of India, and that the sale to Ramdas of Gangtok (Sikkim) was not made under a valid excise pass issued to a person who holds or is deemed under Section 20 of the Bengal Excise Act, 1909, to hold a license thereunder for the sale of foreign liquor. 2. The court further held that the levy of gallonage fee was not legislation regarding inter-State trade and commerce and was, therefore, not ultra vires the powers of the State Legislature under the Constitution.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the petition and discharged the Rule.
( 1 ) THIS is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution. The applicant is P. H. Avari carrying on business at No. 5, Dharamtolla Street, Calcutta. He seeks for a writ of certiorari to quash the order of the Collector of Excise, Calcutta, dated the 30th July, 1954, the order of the Commissioner of Excise, West Bengal, dated the 25th August, 1954 and the order of the Government of West Bengal, dated the 4th October, 1956.
( 2 ) THE order of the Collector of Excise, dated the 30th July, 1954 is the original basic order against which the present complaint is made in the petition. That order stated:--"under Rule 3 (b) of the rules published with the Notification No. 918 (A ). Ex. dated 11-9-42, you are liable to pay gallonage fees amounting to Rs. 11,989/8/- in respect of foreign liquors mentioned in the passes as noted below: (Pass numbers and dates were given in the order) issued by you in favour of the Ramdas-ram Ramphalram of Gangtok (Sikkim) not a licensee within the meaning of the West Bengal Excise Act. "
( 3 ) THERE is another part of the order which asked the applicant to pay gallonage fees amounting to Rs. 1463/8/- in respect of other quantities. But no complaint or objection is made with regard to that. The order complained against directed the applicant: "you are, therefore, directed to pay the gallonage fees amounting to Rs. 11,989/8/- within 7 days from the receipt of this notice. "
( 4 ) THE facts may be stated briefly. The petitioner carries on the business of importing foreign liquor from outside India and selling foreign liquor so imported and country-made to other licensed dealers. He is authorised to carry on such business under a license for the sale of foreign liquor granted under the Bengal Excise Act, 1909. The terms of license material for pur-pqses of this application are:" (I) Sri Pesi Hormusji Avari, resident of Calcutta is hereby authorised by the undersigned. Collector of Excise Calcutta to sell foreign liquor (other than denatured spirit) to licensed dealers at 5, Dharamtolla Street, Calcutta from 1-4-1953 to 31-3-1954. (2) That he do not sell any foreign liquor to another licensed dealer (including holders of licenses for hotels, restaurants, bars, canteens, dak bungalows, railway refreshment rooms, steamers and dining cars) except under a pass to be issued by him, one copy of which should be sent to the Superintendent of Excise, Calcutta, and the other to the Superintendent of Excise of the District to which the consignment is sent. "
( 5 ) IT is the petitioner's case that he has been carrying on such business from the year 1946 under the name and style of Calcutta Foreign Liquor Trading Co. His license has been renewed from year to year. It is also his case that since the beginning of his business he has been selling foreign liquor to other dealers outside India and for this purpose he used to issue passes in terms of the clauses in the license quoted above. In the usual course of business he sold and supplied to Ramdas Ramphalram in Gang-tok (Sikkim) who he alleges is a licensed dealer in foreign liquor in the State of Sikkim. It is his case that he has been selling foreign liquor to Ramdas since the year 1946. In selling and supplying the foreign liquor to Ramdas he issued passes purporting to be in terms of his license and also against excise import permits said to be granted by appropriate authorities in the State of Sikkim. He submitted regularly copies of all passes issued by him covering all sales to Sikkim. (6) A material part of the Bengal Excise (Foreign Liquor License Fee) Rules with which it will be necessary to deal came into operation from 6-11-1950. The petitioner's case is that he has been dealing with Sikkim before 6-11-1950. Section 12 of the Bengal Excise Act provides that--"no intoxicant exceeding such quantity as the Provincial Government may prescribe by notification either generally or for any specified local area, shall be imported, exported o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.