RENUPADA MUKHERJEE
PRABIRENDRA NATH NANDAY – Appellant
Versus
NARENDRA NATH NANDAY – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS appeal raises a pure question of law which does not appear to be covered by any direct authority of this court, viz. , whether the owner of an immoveable property can, on the termination of a license, maintain a suit against his licensee for a mandatory injunction directing him to vacate the property.
( 2 ) IN order to appreciate how the above question of law has arisen in this appeal it is necessary to state the following facts:---
( 3 ) ONE deceased Bhabani Nath Nandi, a Superintendent of Police owned a house in Raja-shahi town which is now in East Pakistan. After the partition of Bengal he migrated to West Bengal and rented a house in Berhampore town within Murshidabad District belonging to a Muhammedan named Afazuddin Ahmed a Muk-tear of the local courts. The latter in his turn migrated to East Pakistan and occupied Bhabani Nath Nandy's house at Rajashahi as a tenant. Neither party paid any rent as the rents of the two houses being of the same amount were mutually set off. Bhabani's nephew Naren-dra Nath Nandy, respondent of this appeal was a defendant in the trial court. He was a dependent of Bhabani and was allowed to occupy a part of the B
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.