SINHA
SUSHIL CHANDRA GHOSE – Appellant
Versus
INCOME-TAX OFFICER, DISTRICT V. – Respondent
( 1 ) THESE are three applications arising from a common set of facts. There are also two contempt applications arising therefrom. They have been heard together and it will be convenient to dispose of all the five applications by one judgment.
( 2 ) THE facts in these cases are briefly as follows: the petitioner's assessment for the year 1945-46 was completed on 18tn August, 1945. With regard to the assessment which had been made, he has paid the amount which I am told is Rs. 10,107-7-0. Under Section 2 (11) of the Income-tax Act (hereinafter called the 'act'), the words "previous year" have been defined. The relevant part of the definition is as follows : '' (11 ). 'previous year' means. (i) in respect of any separate source of income, proats and gains, (a) the twelve months ending on 31st day of March next preceding the year for which the assessment is to be made, or, if the accounts of the assessee have been made up to a dute within the said twelve months in respect of an order ending on any date other than the said 31st day of March, then, at the option of the assessee, the year ending on the date to which his accounts have been made up. "
( 3 ) IN respect of the as
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.