SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(Cal) 139

CHAKRABARTI, DAS GUPTA
SUDHINDRA NATH DUTT – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BIMAL CHATTERJI, G.GUPTA

CHAKRAVARTTI, C. J.

( 1 ) THE appellant Sudhindra Nath Dutt was convicted by Sen J. , at a Sessions trial held on the Original Side of this Court on a charge under Section 120-B, read with Sections 477a and 408 of the Indian Penal Code and seven other charges of specific offences under Section 477a. The verdict of the jury was divided in the proportion of 6 to 3. The learned Judge sentenced the appellant to rigorous imprisonment for four years on the first count, but as regards the remaining counts, he did not pass any separate sentence.

( 2 ) THE offences charged against the appellant were alleged to have been committed by him in his capacity of Managing Director of a bank, called the Calcutta Commercial Bank. He was an accused in several other trials held at the same sitting of the Criminal Sessions for other offences alleged to have been committed in connection with the affairs of the same bank. At all those trials he was further convicted and the sentence passed on one of the convictions was rigorous imprisonment for seven years.

( 3 ) THE appellant preferred separate appeals to this Court from his several convictions. All his appeals were dismissed summarily except the pres




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top