SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(Cal) 126

LAHIRI, B.K.GUHA
HARENDRA KUMAR BASU – Appellant
Versus
CONTAI BUS SYNDICATE LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Arun Kumar Janah, BASANTA KUMAR PANDA, S.C.JANAH

LAHIRI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a Rule obtained by the applicant in, a proceeding for permission to sue in forma pauperis. The facts which are undisputed are these :

( 2 ) ON the 24th September, 1954, the petitioner filed an application under Order 33, Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code which gave rise to Judicial Miscellaneous Case No. 83 of 1954 of the First Court of the Subordinate Judge, Midnapore. Notices of the aforesaid application were Served upon the Government as well as upon the opposite parties. The opposite parties entered appearance on the 26th March, 1955 and the Government Pleader entered appearance on the 16th, of July 1955. On the 9th July, 1955, the applicant filed a list of witnesses and upon that the Court issued summonses on the applicant's witnesses and recorded an order to the effect that non-service of summons would not be a ground of further adjournment and for non-production of documents. The opposite party No. 1 also filed a petition for issuing summonses upon its witnesses and that prayer was allowed on the 10th September, 1955 and the Court again recorded an order that non-service of summons would not be a ground for further adjournment- The proceeding was f





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top