SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(Cal) 45

P.B.MUKHARJI
IN RE: CALCUTTA STOCK EXCHANGE ASSOCIATION LTD. – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.SEN, H.N.SANYAL, R.Choudhary

P. B. MUKHARJI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application by a registered partnership firm called Srigopal Jalan and Co. for an order upon the Calcutta Stock Exchange Association Limited to file a return of allotment in the prescribed form giving all necessary particulars with the Registrar, Companies in respect of 70 forfeited shares re-issued and allotted by the Stock Exchange. The summons was taken out on the 29th June 1956 when the new Companies Act, 1956, had come into operation.

( 2 ) THE application is based on Section 75 of the Companies Act, 1956 and is made under Section 614 of that Act. It raises an important question of principle which involves construction and interpretation of Section 75 of the Companies Act. Before proceeding to discuss law I shall briefly state the facts which are short and simple:

( 3 ) THE applicant claims to be a member and shareholder of the Calcutta Stock Exchange Association Limited; Its case is that the company has from time to time forfeited 70 shares of Rs. 1,000/- each extinguishing the liability in respect of share capital paid up therein and that out of the said forfeited shares 65 had been originally issued for consideration other than cash and





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top