SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Cal) 70

DEBABRATA MOOKHERJEE
JATISH CHANDRA GHOSE – Appellant
Versus
HARISADHAN MUKHERJEE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AJIT KUMAR DUTT, AMAL KUMAR BASU, Anil Kumar Sen, Arun Kumar Dutta, Debi Prasad Pal

DEBABRATA MOOKERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition to quash certain proceedings under Section 500, Penal Code pending against the applicant in the Court of a Magistrate at Midnapore.

( 2 ) THE petitioner is a Member of the West Bengal Legislative Assembly from Ghatal who has been complained against by the opposite party Harisadhan Mukherjee, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Ghatal. Opposite Parties Bhupati Charan Majhi and Raghunath Dalai are respectively the Editor and the Printer and Publisher of a vernacular fortnightly "janamat" published at Ghatal.

( 3 ) IT appears that in January 1954 the petitioner gave notice of his intention to ask certain questions in the West Bengal Legislative Assembly; the questions were however disallowed in accordance with the rules of procedure for the conduct of business of that Assembly. The disallowance was intimated to the petitioner on 16-2-1954. After a whole year the petitioner published the questions in "janamat" in its issue of 28-2-1955.

( 4 ) ON 29-7-1955 the opposite party Harisadhan Mukherjee preferred a complaint charging the petitioner under Section 500, Penal Code and the opposite parties the Editor and the Printer and Publisher of "jana





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top